Analysis Of Noun Phrase In English And Vietnamese Education Essay

Investigation Of Noun Phrase In English And Vietnamese Education Essay Thing phrases just as different expressions assume a significant job in acing any language. Without thing phrase, there would have no operators, no patients, and no beneficiaries. Furthermore, regardless of how wide our jargon might be, a solitary word is regularly inadequate in communicating our idea.. A contrastive examination among English and Vietnamese is fundamental and fascinating for educating and considering. Pretty much every language has thing phrases, be that as it may, in spite of having a similar essential structure, they have some differences..This study expects to investigate inside and outer structure of English and Vietnamese thing phrases at that point cause a correlation between two sorts of NP just as to recommend some educating suggestions. I trust through this task, both I and the perusers will pick up something accommodating which can apply to English instructing and learning. Thing phrase in English Definitions : Le (2002) characterized thing phrase (NP) as a gathering of words starting with a thing and working appositive. This NP frequently goes directly previously or directly after the thing it communicates. Ex: A casualty of war, he loathed seeing fighters. (A casualty of war = he) As per L.H.Nguyen (2004), a NP is a gathering of words with a thing or pronoun as the principle part (the head). In his book Analyzing English, Jackson included some more arrangement about the head which is the negligible necessity for the event of a thing expression. In spite of the NP is in straightforward structure, for example, understudies or in complex structure, for example, the anecdote about the young lady who used to live there, it must have a thing or pronoun communicating the principle thought. Structure : Fundamentally, a thing expression comprises of 3 principle parts : Pre Modification, Head, Post Modification. In any case, in some mind boggling NPs, we can see that the Pre Modification may contain different components. In light of the hypothesis of NP in the book Analyzing English by Howard Jackson, we have a nitty gritty recipe of NP as following : Pre Modification Head Post Modification Pre determiner (A) Identifiers (B) Numeral/Quantifier (C) Descriptive words (D) Thing modifier (E) N/star (F) Relative provisos, non-limited statement, prepositional expression, modifiers, qualifiers. (G) Table 1 : The structure of a NP in English Presently, we will go into subtleties of the structure of a NP. Pre Modification This part fundamentally has 5 components as appeared in the above table. The main component is pre-determiners. They are a little gathering of words which may happen before the identifier in a NP. They additionally have quantifier reference (all, both, half, à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢ ¦); portion numerals (33%, à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢ ¦). Next component is identifiers. This component incorporates articles (an, a, the); definite (this, that, these, those); possessives (my, your, his,㠢â‚ ¬Ã¢ ¦). However, there is one thing we should focus. In any NP, simply just a single identifier may happen, it implies that articles, definite and possessives are totally unrelated. We cannot state that my home yet in the event that we utilization of-express with the possessive pronoun, we can communicate that NP in another way that book of mine. In certain NPs, for example, five felines, a few books, the pre alteration here is numeral (five) or quantifier(several). Likewise, at times, we can see the blend of these two components in certain NPs. The successive groupings are ordinal numeral (particularly first and last ) + inconclusive quantifier ( eg the initial not many hours), ordinal + cardinal (eg the second five days), uncertain quantifier + cardinal numeral, particularly round number (eg a few thousand individuals) (Nguyen, 2004, p. 44). To enhance the head thing somehow or another, the following component, descriptors, come after the identifier and numerals/quantifiers. Be that as it may, in the event that that few descriptive words co-happen in a NP, there is a standard for their request. appellation Size shape age shading starting point substance present participle enchanting Little round old earthy colored French oaken composing table Table 2 : The descriptive word request The last component is thing modifiers which interfere with the descriptive words and the head thing. As should be obvious, things may work as heads of NP as well as modifiers in NP. For instance, in NP a youngsters book, kids alters book and a kids book implies a book for kids. Close to 5 fundamental components referenced above, there is one further sort of pre-adjustment that is NP in genitive case. This sort is set apart by a s added to the its last word (eg my companion s bike). Head : The most normal sort of head of NP is thing, however in certain NPs, for example, She is my closest companion, the head might be a pronoun or something to that affect, generally an individual pronoun (he, she, you㠢â‚ ¬Ã¢ ¦). So also, Jacobs (1995) expressed that numerous NPs in English are single structures comprising maybe just of a thing or a pronoun. At the point when the head is a pronoun, it doesnt need any change, particularly the pre-alteration. Sorts of pronoun working as the head Models Individual pronoun He, she, you, they, we, à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢ ¦. Inconclusive pronoun Somebody, something, nobody,㠢â‚ ¬Ã¢ ¦ Possessive pronoun His, her, your, their,㠢â‚ ¬Ã¢ ¦ Expressive pronoun This, that, à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢ ¦ Table 3 : Kinds of pronoun working as the head of NP Post-adjustment This part is most every now and again followed by expressions or provisions. Three sorts of phrasal/clausal post-adjustment we regularly observe is: relative provisos, non-limited conditions, and prepositional expressions, now and then we likewise observe a descriptive word or an intensifier working as a post-modifier in NP (Jackson, p.15). A relative condition comprises of a relative pronoun (who, whom, which, that, whose,㠢â‚ ¬Ã¢ ¦) as a head, which notices back to the head thing of NP. In the event that the relative pronouns work is object in the relative statement, we can discard that relative pronoun. Non-limited statement is condition generally without subjects presented by a non-limited type of the action word. That sort of proviso incorporate 3 sorts : boundless condition, present participle statement, past participle. In a NP, prepositional expression happens most every now and again working as post-modifier. A few models: All the schools around A B F G (prepositional expression) The most recent couple of days B C F Dong Bang Shin Ki, my preferred music band. F G (appositive NP) My uproarious 4-year-old white Siamese feline B sobriquet age shading F This underhanded assessment authorities getting hand NP Genitive D F The Korea history which has recently been distributed. B D F G (relative provision) Something imperative to do F (uncertain ace) G (modifiers) G (non-limited condition) The young lady behind you B F G (verb modifier) Two ponies eating grass. A F G (non-limited statement : present participle) A signature melody made by Lee So Man B E F G (non-limited statement : past participle) 33% of the populace A B F Thing phrase in Vietnamese Definitions : Mai, Vu and Hoang (2006) characterized NP (danh ng㠡⠻â ¯) is an expression wherein the thing capacity as the fundamental part. Additionally, NP in the hypothesis of Doan, Nguyen, Pham (2001) is a free mix of a thing core and at least one than one subordinate components which can be front components remaining before the core thing or can be end components remaining after the core thing. Structure : As an expression, NP in Vietnamese likewise has three primary parts : Pre-Modification (Front Element), Head (Nucleus), Post-Modification (End Element). Increasingly definite, as per Mai et al. s hypothesis (pp. 276-280), the structure of NP in Vietnamese can be depicted as following : T㠡⠺â ¥t c㠡⠺â £ nh㠡⠻â ¯ng Cã ¡i con mã ¨o Ä‘en à ¡Ã¢ ºÃ¢ ¥y (- 3) (- 2) (- 1) Head thing (0) (1) (2) Table 4 : The structure of a NP in Vietnamese Front components As should be obvious from the table, the components in the position (- 3), (- 2) and (- 1) are called front components, while the components remaining after the core (1) and (2) are called end components. Those components are set in a steady manner as appeared in the above table. As far as the front components , we have three sorts. In the position (- 1), quantifiers, for example, t㠡⠺â ¥t c㠡⠺â £, t㠡⠺â ¥t th㠡⠺â £y, h㠡⠺â ¿t th㠡⠺â £y, h㠡⠺â ¿t c㠡⠺â £, c㠡⠺â £,㠢â‚ ¬Ã¢ ¦.are utilized. Those words can happen previously: positive numerals : m㠡⠻â„ ¢t, hai, ba, b㠡⠻‘n,㠢â‚ ¬Ã¢ ¦ Ex : t㠡⠺â ¥t c㠡⠺â £ b㠡⠻‘n mã†â °Ã£â€ Ã¢ ¡i sinh viã ªn (1) aggregate things : Ä‘ã n, lã… Â ©, bã ³, b㠡⠻â„ ¢, n㠡⠺â ¯m, à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢ ¦. Ex: c㠡⠺â £ lã… Â © con trai general things : qu㠡â ºn, à ¡o, binh, lã ­nh, xe c㠡⠻â„ ¢, mã ¡y mã ³c,㠢â‚ ¬Ã¢ ¦ Ex: h㠡⠺â ¿t th㠡⠺â £y mã ¡y mã ³c Lets focus on the quantifiers, for example, t㠡⠺â ¥t c㠡⠺â £, t㠡⠺â ¥t th㠡⠺â £y, h㠡⠺â ¿t th㠡⠺â £y, h㠡⠺â ¿t c㠡⠺â £, cà ¡Ã‚ ºÃ‚ £,à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦.From the models above, we can see that such those quantifiers happen before the head thing. Presently, taking the primary model, is it right on the off chance that we state it in such a manner b㠡⠻‘n mã†â °Ã£â€ Ã¢ ¡i sinh viã ªn t㠡⠺â ¥t c㠡⠺â £ ? As a matter of fact, as far as language, it is right yet the significance is extraordinary. The NP t㠡⠺â ¥t c㠡⠺â £ b㠡⠻‘n mã†â °Ã£â€ Ã¢ ¡i sinh viã ªn implies that no understudies are left, yet in b㠡⠻‘n mã†â °Ã£â€ Ã¢ ¡i sinh viã ªn t㠡⠺â ¥t c㠡⠺â £, there are a few understudies left. In this way, we can presume that t㠡⠺â ¥t c㠡⠺â £ can remain when the head thing relying upon the speakers consideration. Diep Quang Ban (2000) expressed that position (- 2) is the spot taken by word class as following : Clear numeral/cardinal number (t㠡⠻â « ch㠡⠻†° s㠡⠻‘ lã†â °Ã£ ¡Ã¢ »Ã¢ £ng xã ¡c đ㠡⠻†¹nh/s㠡⠻‘ t㠡⠻â «) M㠡⠻â„ ¢t, hai, ba, b㠡⠻‘n, mã†â °Ã£ ¡Ã¢ »Ã¢ i, trã„æ'm à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢ ¦.. Mã†â °Ã£ ¡Ã¢ »Ã¢ i con mã ¨o Gauge